Open Innovation & Stakeholders Engagement
Research Areas : Technology Management
Farzane ryBakhtia
1
Mojtaba Nahid
2
Abstract :
The paradox of open innovation lies in the conflict between the practical desire to reap the benefits of open innovation and concern over the risk that others will misappropriate those benefits. Open innovation models bring changes in the firm's approach to strategic management of technology. Over the years, as a response to emerges at significant improvements in the competitive environment. Open innovation that we can always make progress because all ideas are good ideas, Also all ideas can be developed, if the idea is worth thinking about, it is worth telling. We are creative and we can get more creative. Stakeholder theory and recent developments in value creation through stakeholder engagement can assist with reconciliation of this inherent structural risk. The limitations of existing open innovation typologies are identified, and a process-based model of open innovation is proposed. The model is then expanded to include stakeholder engagement. When integrated with stakeholder engagement, open innovation processes can be understood to generate benefits beyond the acquisition of specific information sought from external experts. The addition of stakeholder engagement to the open innovation model allows for greater understanding and easier acceptance of the risks inherent in the open innovation process. Therefore this application article uses library overview and in addition to this, it focuses on open innovation literature and some of its models. Also, it Deals with the relationship between open innovation and stakeholder participation And would be try to provide the benefits and risks of engagement to the audience.
1- ثقفی، فاطمه؛ عباسی، کلثوم؛ کشتگاری، احسان؛ (1393) طراحي چارچوب شناسايي و اولويت‌بندي ذينفعان مبتني بر روش فراتلفيق؛ نشريه علمي پژوهشي مديريت فردا، سال سيزدهم.#
2- پارسائیان، علی؛ اعرابی، سید محمد (1385)، رفتار سازمانی، چاپ نهم، انتشارات نیل.#
3- حجازی، سیدرضا؛ شاهوردی، معصومه؛ مرادی، افسانه (1389)، نقش مدیریت مالکیت فکری در نوآوری باز در سازمان‌های دانش‌بنیان، اولین کنفرانس سالانه مدیریت، نوآوری و کارآفرینی، شیراز.#
4- رمضانپور نرگسی، قاسم؛ داوری، علی؛ افراسیابی، راحله؛ زرگران یزد، بهاره (1393)، بررسی تأثیر عوامل درونی و بیرونی بر نوآوری باز، فصلنامه توسعه مدیریت و فناوری، دوره دوم.#
5- زارعی، علی‌اصغر؛ نسیمی، همایون (2008)، فصلنامه مدیریت منابع انسانی در صنعت نفت مؤسسه مطالعات بین‌المللی انرژی، شماره 1.#
6- نظری، محمدجعفر؛ (1393)، مديريت اثربخش ذينفعان؛ وظيفه دشوار كسب وكار، روزنامه دنیای اقتصاد، شماره 3447 .#
7- ANDRIOF, J.,Waddock, S. (2002). Unfolding stakeholder en- gagement. In: Andriof, J., Waddock, S., Husted, B., Sutherland, R.S. (Eds.), Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking: Theory, Respon- sibility and Engagement,Vol. 1. Greenleaf Publishing Limited, Sheffield, pp. 19-42.#
8- ANTONACOPOULOU, E.P., Meric, J. (2005). From power to knowledge relationships:Stakeholder interactions as learning partnerships. In: Bonnafous-Boucher, M., Pesqueux Y. (Eds.), Stakeholder Theory: A European Perspective. Pal- grave Macmillan, New York, pp. 125-147.#
9- BADEN, D. (2010). CSR: An opportunity for SMEs. In: Louche, C., Idowu, S. O., Filho, W. L. (Eds.), Innovative CSR: From risk management to value creation. Greenleaf Publish- ing Limited, Sheffield, pp. 84-101.#
10- BELL, D. (1973). The Coming of Post-industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. Basic Books, New York.#
11- BLAXILL, M., Eckardt, R. (2009). The Invisible Edge: Taking Your Strategy to the Next Level Using Intellectual Property. Penguin Group, New York.#
12- BOGERS, M. (2011). The open innovation paradox: knowl- edge sharing and protection in R and D collaborations. Eu- ropean Journal of Innovation Management, 14(1), 93-117.#
13- C. Prahalad and G. Hamel. (1990). “The Core Competence of the Corporation,«Harvard Business Review, Nr. Mai- Juni, p. 79–91.#
14- BOURNE, L., Walker, D.T. (2005). Visualising and mapping stakeholder influence. Management Decision, 43(5), 649-660.#
15- D’AVENI, R.A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the Dy- namics of Strategic Maneuvering.The Free Press, New York.#
16- DUARTE,V.V., Sarkar, S.S. (2011). Separating the wheat from the chaff: A taxonomy of open innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(4), 435-459.#
17- FREEMAN, R.E., Harrison, J.S., Wicks, A.C. (2007). Managing for Stakeholders: Survival, Reputation, and Success.Yale Uni- versity Press, New Haven.#
18- FREEMAN, R.E., Harrison, J.S., Wicks, A.C., Parmer, B. L., de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.#
19- GAO, S.S., Zhang, J.J. (2006). Stakeholder engagement, social auditing and corporate sustainability. Business Process Man- agement Journal, 12(6), 722-740.#
20- GAO, S.S., Zhang, J.J. (2001). A comparative study of stake- holder engagement strategies in social auditing. In: Andriof, J., McIntosh, M. (Eds.), Perspectives on Corporate Citizen- ship. Greenleaf Publishing Limited, Sheffield, pp. 239-255.#
21- GIANNOPOULOU, E., Yström, A., Ollila, S., Fredberg, T., Elmquist, M. (2010). Implications of openness: A study into (all) the growing literature on open innovation. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 5(3), 162-180.#
22- HERZOG,P. (2008) Open and Closed Innovation. Different Cultures for Different Strategies. Wiesbaden: Betriebswirtschaftlicher Verlag Gabler.#
23- Ho (2011) "Meditation, learning, organizational innovation and performance", Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 111 Iss: 1, pp.113 - 131.#
24- HUIZINGH, E.K.R.E. (2011). Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives.Technovation, 31(1), 2-9.#
25- H. W. Chesbrough. (2003) the Era of Open Innovation. Vol. 44, No. 3, 2003, p. 35–41.#
26- JARVENPAA, S.L.,Wernick, A. (2011) Paradoxical tensions in open innovation networks. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(4), 521-548.#
27- KIM,W.C., Mauborgne, R. (2005). Blue Ocean Strategy: How to Create Uncontested Market Space and Make the Com- petition Irrelevant. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.#
28- KIM, W.C., Mauborgne, R. (2009). How strategy shapes structure. Harvard Business Review, 87(9), 72-80.#
29- LICHTENTHALER, U. (2011). Open innovation: Past re- search, current debates, and future directions. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(1), 75-93.#
30- LICHTENTHALER, U., Frishammar, J. (2011). The impact of aligning product development and technology licensing: A contingency perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Man- agement, 28(S1), 89-103.#
31- LEWIS, M. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more com- prehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25(4),7.#
32- LEWRICK, M., Raeside, R., Peisl, T. (2007). The innovators’s social network. Journal of Technology Management & Inno- vation, 2(3), 38-48.#
33- MAAK, T. (2007). Responsible leadership, stakeholder en- gagement, and the emergence of social capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 329-343.#
34- MAEHLER, A.E., Curado, C.M.M., Pedrozo, E.Á., Pires, J.P. (2011). Knowledge transfer and innovation in Brazilian mul- tinational companies. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 6(4), 1-13.#
35- MAHR, D., Rindfleisch, A., Slotegraaf, R.J. (2010). Innovation Beyond Firm Boundaries: The Routines and Resource In- vestment of Successful External Problem Solvers. Paper pre- sented at American Marketing Association Winter Educa- tors’ Conference, New Orleans, LA, February 19-22. http:// ebookbrowse.com/rindfleisch-background-paper-march-2010-pdf-d138594519 [Accessed May 2, 2012].#
36- MITCHELL, R.K., Agle, B.R., Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.#
37- MITCHELL, R.K.,Agle, B.R., Chrisman, J.J., Spence, L.J. (2011). Toward a theory of stakeholder salience in family firms. Busi- ness Ethics Quarterly, 21(2), 235-255.#
38- MOHAMED, S., Mynors, D., Grantham, A., Chan, P., Coles, R., Walsh, K. (2007). Unearthing key drivers of knowledge leak- age. International Journal of Knowledge Management Stud- ies, 1(3/4), 456–470.#
39- MYERS, M.B., Cheung, M.-S. (2008). Sharing global supply chain knowledge. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49(4), 66-73.#
40- NOLAND, J., Phillips, R. (2010). Stakeholder engagement, discourse ethics and strategic management. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 39-49.#
41- NONAKA, I. (2007).The knowledge creating company. Har- vard Business Review, 85(7/8), 162-171.#
42- O. Gassmann. (2006). «Opening up the innovation process: towards an agenda,» R&D Management, Nr. 36, pp. 223-228.#
43- OZMAN, M. (2011). Modularity, industry life cycle and open innovation. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 6(1), 26-37.#
44- PLAZA-ÚBEDA, J.A., Burgos-Jiménez, J.J.,Vazquez, D.A., Lis- ton-Heyes, C.C. (2009). The ‘win–win’ paradigm and stake- holder integration. Business Strategy and the Environment,499.#
45- PORTER, M.E. (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. Free Press, New York.#
46- ROHRBECK, R. (2010). Harnessing a network of experts for competitive advantage: technology scouting in the ICT in- dustry. R and D Management, 40(2), 169-180.#
47- SAVINO, D.M. (2009). The role of technology as an enabler in job redesign. Journal of Technology Management & Inno- vation, 4(3), 14-23.#
48- SAVIT#SKAYA, I., Salmi, P.,Torkkeli, M. (2010). Barriers to open innovation: Case China. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 5(4), 10-21.#
49- SENGE, P.M. (2006). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Prac- tice of the Learning Organization. (Rev. ed.) Currency/Dou- bleday, New York.
50- Simard, C. & West, J. (2006). Knowledge Networks and the Geographic Locus of Innovation, in H. W.#
51- Simard, C. and West, J. (2006). Networks and Open Innovation. In H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, and J. West (Eds.) Open Innovation: Researching a New paradigm. Oxford University Press.#
52- SMITH, N.C., Drumwright, M.E., Gentile, M.C. (2010). The new marketing myopia. Journal of Public Policy and Market- ing, 29(1), 4-11.#
53- SVENDSEN, A. (1998). The Stakeholder Strategy: Profiting from Collaborative Business Relationships. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc, San Francisco.#
54- TEECE, D.J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and pub- lic policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285-305.#
55- TROTT, P., Hartmann, D. (2009). Why ‘Open Innovation’ is old wine in new bottles. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(4), 715-736.#
56- VAN DE VRANDE, V., de Jong, J.P.J., Vanhaverbeke, W., de Rochemont, M. (2009). Open innovation in SME’s: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, 29(6/7), 423-437.#
57- VANHAVERBEKE, W. (2006). The interorganizational con- text of open innovation. In: Chesbroug.#
58- von Hippel, E. (1988). The Sources of Innovation, New York, Oxford University Press.#
59- WADDOCK, S. (2001). Integrity and mindfulness: Founda- tions of corporate citizenship. In: Andriof, J., McIntosh, M. (Eds.), Perspectives on Corporate Citizenship. Greenleaf Publishing Limited, Sheffield, pp. 26-38.#
60- WEST, J. (2006). Appropriability and open innovation. In: Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., West, J. (Eds.), Open In- novation: Researching a New Paradigm. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 109-133.#
61- WEST, J., O’Mahony, S. (2008). The role of participation ar- chitecture in growing sponsored open source communities. Industry and Innovation, 15(2), 145-168.#
